🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to reinitiate atomic discussions with Washington on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi declared solely negotiations worked, and revealed fresh requests had come from mediators to restart negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to access struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Path

Araghchi is walking a complex route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be acting from a situation of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen stronger in military terms and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium domestically that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Previous Talks Suddenly Concluded

The prior phases of talks between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with Donald Trump declaring the locations had been obliterated. Subsequently, Western states employed their authority to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with US participation could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could work inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Officials asserted three times they had reached agreement with the US representative the US official only for the deal to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Existing Situation

Iranian officials stated the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be revived in some form if talks restart.

Trump last week claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to restart talks, but in private Iran's diplomats say they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from the United States either directly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been accused of passivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a show.

Political Position

In his remarks to the gathering, designed to depict the US as a controlling nation that misuses the concept of international law, Araghchi declared the fortnight-long engagement showed the clash could not be ended by armed force. He said the attacks commenced with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were executed with complete American awareness and collaboration, making faith challenging to rebuild.

Diplomacy Remains the Final Solution

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had always attempted to impose their will during the talks. Dialogue can still be active and remains the ultimate answer to settle conflicts, but its standards, guidelines and principles must be respected."

"In case they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and honor, they will obtain a answer in the identical approach."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the conflict of restoration and reconstruction, the foreign minister stated he was confident Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We learned many lessons from this war; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He added: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The facilities and equipment, if eliminated, will be restored; what is crucial is the will of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but were unable to break. The Iranian people have grown more resilient, more integrated, and more supportive of the leadership and the state in the wake of this attack."